Slaughter in San Francisco is
promoted as a Chuck Norris film, but he is neither the central figure in the movie
nor in it very much. The main actor in the film is martial artist Don Wong, who
plays Officer Don Wong, a San Francisco police officer who goes rogue against his
department. So, while the Walker, Texas Ranger star is not really the star
of this film, the real question is, how bad does a movie have to be to embarrass
Chuck Norris (rumor has it)?
Legend has it that Don Wong, the actor,
replaced Bruce Lee, who had been allegedly set to star in the film had he not died. Although
the film’s director, Wei Lo, had directed Lee in The Big Boss (1971) and
Fist of Fury (1972), it seems doubtful that the icon would have ended up
in something like this. Each of Lee’s films seems to be several notches above what
we see in Slaughter in San Francisco, which lacks the charm and
wit of the star’s body of work.
The film is perfect for VHS with its
1.33:1 aspect ratio and ridiculous dubbing, including American actors like Norris,
which provides the perfect argument for the existence of this blog. Rumor has
it that there is a DVD with a 2.35:1 aspect ratio and no dubbing, but who wants
that? No amount of pristine cinematography or surround sound can cover up the
stench of a dung heap.
The plot of the film is your basic
rogue cop cleans up a dirty system story. Officers Wong and John Sumner (Robert
Jones) rescue a young woman from an attempted rape that she later denies happened.
It turns out that her attackers are members of a criminal organization led by
San Francisco crime lord Chuck Slaughter, played by Chuck Norris. Wong and
Sumner’s persistence leads to the former’s suspension and the latter’s murder,
leading to the cliché of the noble cop avenging his fallen partner. That’s
about the only thing in this movie that you can really comprehend as the police
captain (Dan Ivan) turns out to be corrupt and ends up paying the ultimate
price at the hands (literally) of Wong, who ends up getting reinstated—how did Wong
escape manslaughter charges at the very least?
As badly put together as I found this
film, it does ultimately work as a thoroughly 70s martial arts films that goes completely
through the looking glass and ends up being entertaining for all the wrong
reasons, including Norris’ ridiculously abundant body hair. Hey, nobody watches
a kung fu movie for a riveting plot or nuanced performance.
No comments:
Post a Comment